<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Association for Downloadable Media &#187; sponsorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/tag/sponsorship/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.downloadablemedia.org</link>
	<description>This is the official site of the Association for Downloadable Media. Blog posts are authored by the ADM board and members.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.4" mode="simple" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>This is the official blog of the Association for Downloadable Media. Posts are authored by the ADM board and members.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Association for Downloadable Media</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.downloadablemedia.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Association for Downloadable Media</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>karl.edwards@boldenterprises.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>karl.edwards@boldenterprises.com (Association for Downloadable Media)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>2006-2007</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>This is the official site of the Association for Downloadable Media. Blog posts are authored by the ADM board and members.</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Podcasting: The Curse of Convenience</title>
		<link>http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/podcasting-the-curse-of-convenience</link>
		<comments>http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/podcasting-the-curse-of-convenience#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Webster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADM Podcast Episodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sponsorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.downloadablemedia.org/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently gave a talk at the New Media Expo on the efficacy of podcast advertising and some additional data on the makeup of the audience for downloadable media. I concluded that talk with three points for my audience to ponder (and if you were there on that Friday afternoon, I&#8217;m honored and grateful you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently gave a talk at the <a href="http://www.newmediaexpo.com">New Media Expo</a> on the efficacy of podcast advertising and some additional data on the makeup of the audience for downloadable media. I concluded that talk with three points for my audience to ponder (and if you were there on that Friday afternoon, I&#8217;m honored and grateful you came.) The last point generated more talkabout than the first two, so I thought I would expand a bit here on what I meant by the curse of convenience:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.downloadablemedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/convenient078.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-176" src="http://www.downloadablemedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/convenient078.png" alt="" width="400" /></a></p>
<p>Lots of folks came up to me afterwards to chat about this one! Here was my point: Downloadable media represents a solution for consumers who want to control their media and be the programmers of their own personal media experience. It&#8217;s one of the reasons I am so bullish on the space: regardless of the penetration and uptake of the word &#8220;podcasting&#8221; (<a href="http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php">which we currently have at 37%</a>), the desire to listen to what you want, when you want and on whatever device you want will soon be ubiquitous. The &#8220;convenience&#8221; of podcasts is clearly a big selling point&#8211;why be tethered to a television set or a radio at a specific time and place when I can take content with me and consume it when I want? Kind of a no-brainer.</p>
<p>So, yes, the &#8220;convenience&#8221; of your podcast is a feature&#8211;even a benefit&#8211;but my point here is that it isn&#8217;t the feature you should lead with. What you should lead with is how <em>incredible</em> your content is, and why, even though it is available to be listened to at anytime, it should be listened to <strong>now</strong>, or at least on the day it is released. There are two very compelling reasons why:</p>
<ol>
<li>If your content can be consumed <em>any</em> old time, then it is easy to put off until later&#8211;or never. In other words, given a choice between something that is time-sensitive or has some kind of urgency attached to it, and something that doesn&#8217;t, the squeaky wheel gets the grease every time. I find that there are a lot of podcasts in my iTunes repository that simply go unlistened to or unwatched because they get bumped to the back of the line behind more topical content. If there is no <em>need</em> to listen to a given podcast now, then it can often fall victim to the urgent.</p>
<p><span id="more-175"></span></p>
<p>Note that this &#8220;need&#8221; doesn&#8217;t have to be tied to a date or time, but to a context: if you train your audience that your lawn-care podcast is meant to be listened to <em>when you mow your lawn</em>, then you can begin to habituate your audience to strapping on their iPod every time they fire up the Lawnmaster 5000&#8211;and be assured of a consistent weekly reach.</li>
<p></p>
<li>Closely related to that issue is the hard fact that currently a typical podcast ad or sponsorship campaign can take longer to show results than campaigns across other media. With money, you can do anything&#8211;and I know that with money I can <em>ensure</em> that a radio listener or tv viewer will see my message at least 3x within a given, short window. With podcasts, because they are consumed asynchronously and over varying lengths of time, I have no control over reach and frequency within a given time window. A typical audience member might hear my message three times in a week and a half, or three times over six weeks. When you are competing for ad and sponsorship dollars with media that have a firmer grip on that reality, you start behind the eight-ball.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now, here is the part I needed to do a better job elaborating upon at the NME, so let&#8217;s cover it here. None of this means that you can&#8217;t have evergreen content (indeed, you should) or that you need to &#8220;live stream&#8221; everything&#8211;nonsense. You keep doing that content voodoo you do, edited and produced to the level you see fit, and containing whatever content makes you passionate. Ultimately, selling that passion across to your audience (and transferring it, where appropriate, to relevant advertisers and sponsors) is what successfully monetizing your content is all about. I am merely suggesting that podcasters take a tip from broadcast radio and do everything in your power to create true appointment media&#8211;content that you could consume tomorrow or next week if you want to, but at some opportunity cost.
</p>
<p>Think about how broadcast radio (especially music radio) does this every day. Theoretically there is no difference between a classic rock station at 10 AM and one at 10 PM&#8211;you could hear the same music at any time (and there&#8217;s a topic for a future column&#8230;) So the best broadcast radio stations build appointments for listeners to check in at, say, &#8220;9&#8243;, &#8220;2&#8243; and &#8220;5&#8243; (get it? 9-2-5?) to get clues for a contest, or give away concert tickets at 4 PM, or feature big benchmarks or promotions on the day when most listeners get and begin to fill out their Arbitron diaries (for the diary markets) in order to be fresh and top-of-mind when the ratings process begins. Gaming the system? Sure&#8211;but it is all about being indispensable. If your content can be listened to any old time, then what&#8217;s the rush?</p>
<p>Luckily, podcasters&#8211;especially independent subject matter experts who bring unsurpassed passion, commitment and focus to their programs&#8211;have one up on traditional media&#8211;the engagement of their audience, and their trust in you and the choices you make. For many of you, all you may have to do is &#8220;ask for the order&#8221; by reminding people to download your next show &#8220;next Friday at noon!&#8221; For podcasts that have a contextual or lifestyle hook, continually educate your viewers and listeners about <em>how to use your show.</em> Got a podcast about what is going on in your local market this weekend? <em>Insist</em> that it be listened to Friday on the way home. A fitness podcast? Take it with you every day to the gym. A meditation podcast? Call it &#8220;Lunchtime Meditation.&#8221;
</p>
<p>The other advantage most new media producers have is a compelling web presence and a tightly integrated online community. If you give that community reasons to make a weekly (or semi-weekly, or bi-weekly) appointment with your show, and continually reinforce that with your community through a variety of social media outlets, they will come. Broadcasting your show live with an integrated chat or voice interaction component is certainly one way to drive appointment-based listening or viewing of a podcast that will be available for &#8220;convenient&#8221; consumption later, but not the only way. Even for highly edited or produced shows, there could be a time-sensitive interaction (download the show at noon and respond by five to hear your question on the very next show, for example&#8211;c&#8217;mon, y&#8217;all are more creative than I am!) Again, your ace in the hole here is the fact that podcasters are capable of maintaining deeper relationships and levels of trust with their audience than are most forms of media&#8211;never abuse that, but don&#8217;t hesitate to use it to your advantage by asking your audience to move your show a couple of notches up their consideration set.
</p>
<p>Of course, the best way to be unmissable is to create unmissable content. I used my TiVo a lot this past year, but I watched American Idol and Lost on the nights they aired. From some of the new media stars I heard from and spoke with at the New Media Expo, I can tell you that it&#8217;s out there! But it never hurts to ask for the order, educate your audience, and make it <em>inconvenient</em> to put off your show for one day longer.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading.</p>
<p>-Tom</p>
<p>Tom Webster<br />
Vice President, Strategy and Marketing<br />
Edison Media Research<br />
<a href="http://www.edisonresearch.com">www.edisonresearch.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/podcasting-the-curse-of-convenience/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A German Discussion On Monetization</title>
		<link>http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/a-german-discussion-on-monetization</link>
		<comments>http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/a-german-discussion-on-monetization#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian 'mee-z' Miessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising & Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sponsorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/a-german-discussion-on-monetization</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday I had a discussion with my partners from Adlateral and German Über-Podcaster Alex Wunschel about the difficulties of monetizing German podcasts.
We quickly agreed that the size of the market (maybe just about a quarter of the US in reach) cannot be the reason. Advertising financed media works all around the globe no matter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday I had a discussion with my partners from <a href="http://adlateral.de/">Adlateral</a> and German Über-Podcaster <a href="http://tellerrand.typepad.com/">Alex Wunschel</a> about the difficulties of monetizing German podcasts.</p>
<p>We quickly agreed that the size of the market (maybe just about a quarter of the US in reach) cannot be the reason. Advertising financed media works all around the globe no matter how big or small the market is, no matter if the market is defined by language, distribution, geography or any other parameter.<br />
<span id="more-28"></span><br />
We saw the reason somewhere else: It is not the lack of reach itself, but advertisers not seeing the value of the reached audience, not seeing the potential of reaching a particular audience.</p>
<p>On the one hand this has to do with who a podaster is talking to, which has to do with who listens. Here in Germany a lot of this business goes through media buyers. Media buyers are &#8211; well, need to be &#8211; spreadsheet driven. Of course they not only look for reach, but also for the right audience. But in the end of the day, all they want to do is buy lots of advertising space for the least money.<br />
On the other end we have a handful of marketing agencies that sell this advertising space. Either because they work for one of the bigger publishing houses that do downloadable media now, or they aggregate podcasts. Again spreadsheet driven, again selling inventory for as expensive as possible.</p>
<p>All negotiation is about CPM.</p>
<p>The negotiation should be about something else: How do you &#8211; the advertiser &#8211; get your message across and how can I &#8211; the podcaster &#8211; help you.</p>
<p>Most podcasts over here are not ready for simple ad placement. But they have a very committed audience. This commitment needs to utilized. And yes, creativity needs to be involved, and yes this doesn&#8217;t make things easier.</p>
<p>Of course this is nothing new. This model has been around for a while, sometimes called sponsorship.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, realizing this helped us to focus. Focus on who to approach. Focus on what to offer. Maybe this makes monetizing podacsts a little easier now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.downloadablemedia.org/index.php/a-german-discussion-on-monetization/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
